Elections, Voting Rules And Paradoxical Outcomes

Thảo luận trong 'Học tập' bởi downloadeb, 21/5/2024.

  1. downloadeb

    downloadeb Thành viên nổi tiếng

    Tham gia:
    20/5/2024
    Bài viết:
    5,989
    Đã được thích:
    0
    Điểm thành tích:
    86
    Click Here to Download: https://ouo.io/QNV8Wt
    [​IMG]
    Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes
    By: William V. Gehrlein; Dominique Lepelley
    Publisher:
    Springer
    Print ISBN: 9783319646589, 3319646583
    eText ISBN: 9783319646596, 3319646591
    Copyright year: 2017
    Format: PDF
    Available from $ 129.00 USD
    SKU 9783319646596
    This monograph studies voting procedures based on the probability that paradoxical outcomes like the famous Condorcet Paradox might exist. It is well known that hypothetical examples of many different paradoxical election outcomes can be developed, but this analysis examines factors that are related to the process by which voters form their preferences on candidates that will significantly reduce the likelihood that such voting paradoxes will ever actually be observed. It is found that extreme forms of voting paradoxes should be uncommon events with a small number of candidates. Another consideration is the propensity of common voting rules to elect the Condorcet Winner, which is widely accepted as the best choice as the winner, when it exists. All common voting rules are found to have identifiable scenarios for which they perform well on the basis of this criterion. But, Borda Rule is found to consistently work well at electing the Condorcet Winner, while the other voting rules have scenarios where they work poorly or have a very small likelihood of electing a different candidate than Borda Rule. The conclusions of previous theoretical work are presented in an expository format and they are validated with empirically-based evidence. Practical implications of earlier studies are also developed.
     

    Xem thêm các chủ đề tạo bởi downloadeb
    Đang tải...


Chia sẻ trang này